What is Planning Structure-Frequently Asked Questions-Structure of Planning

Structure of Planning

Structure planning provides unified, comprehensive, and systematic administration of the effects and prerequisites of development or redevelopment of large regions under the authority of many proprietors. Its application, particularly in metropolitan areas, encourages the sustainable management of physical and ecological resources. In this article, we will cover the structure of planning along with equivalent matters around the topic.

Designs include diagrams, maps, or drawings outlining layouts, amenities, and interconnections. Structural plans generally lack detailed lot boundaries or specific building arrangements. Accompanying maps or plans come with written descriptions explaining development challenges and their solutions.

Structure of Planning

Structure plans were first recognized as overarching development strategies with the introduction of the Town and Country Planning Act in 1968. A county council or a group of local governments might potentially develop such a policy collaboratively. These plans included a twenty-year strategy framework and a “key diagram” that visually depicted topics linked to land use, transportation, and the environment (rather than relying on location-specific maps). District councils, not county councils, were responsible for developing local plans, which had to adhere to the structure plan’s overall strategy. The structure of planning includes the following:

Environmental Risks

The study of potential natural hazards is an essential part of the structural planning approach. To appraise a location accurately and plan effectively, one needs a deep understanding of natural hazards and associated risks to development. The evaluation of prospective natural hazards can help determine the appropriateness of a certain parcel of land for future infrastructure and development. Evaluations of natural hazards may recommend avoiding certain areas entirely or identifying issues to address before construction.

Amenities for the Public

The proposed development type dictates the breadth and nature of community infrastructure in a structural plan region. In order to get a more comprehensive understanding of the community facilities’ needs and the stakeholders’ objectives, it may be necessary to incorporate a requirements assessment into the structural plan development process. Evaluating needs considers individual requirements, population growth, and existing infrastructure to determine which facilities to supply.

Use of Urban Space and Land

Structure plans can detail why certain areas undergo specific urban development. Urban form involves the interaction and intensity of multiple land uses in the built environment. Successful urban design uses a “multi-nodal” approach, aligning varied forms with accessibility levels. Promoting higher-density land use expansion near transit hubs and other areas that encourage walking and bicycling are two examples.

Approach to Implementation

Success often hinges on efficiently implementing a well-developed strategy. The structural plan identifies development initiatives; the implementation section coordinates efforts with procedures, timelines, and accountability.

Consultation and Engagement Report

Transparency in engagement scope, consultation efforts, participant count, achieved participation level, and identified concerns within the framework plan is crucial. This demonstrates consideration of stakeholders’ perspectives, Tangata Whenua, and community constituents, aligning with consultation standards in Section 82 of the LGA. Moreover, it emphasizes an open explanation of how consultation feedback was reviewed and incorporated into final conclusions. Meeting the criteria specified in Section 82 of the LGA, it acknowledges diverse stakeholder viewpoints, ensuring a methodical presentation links proposed solutions to raised issues.

Effective Project Management

Integrating reserves and open space networks into architectural plans can address various issues. These considerations may relate to water quality, natural and cultural heritage protection, future population recreation needs, and hazard management. Furthermore, planned structures are capable of performing a number of the secondary purposes listed below. Officials can declare reserves by designating the future area on a map, with negotiators refining details. Symbols can also demonstrate this.

Communications Systems

The accessibility and practicability of network facilities such as roads, water, gas, electricity, and telecommunications services can have a significant impact on land-use possibilities in a construction or planning area. As a result, network utility providers have tremendous impact over the effective execution of a thoroughly prepared strategy. Early dialogue on structure plan provisions through an RMA plan supports council and utility provider goals, ensuring certainty and preventing delays. Infrastructure providers benefit from the use of conventional roading plans that include allowances for infrastructure construction, such as large margins. As a result, service providers can be confident that the projected development would be feasible.

Concepts, Big Picture, Strategic Goals

While working on the minute elements of a construction design, it is easy to lose sight of the overall picture. To understand the challenges, develop a vision statement and objectives early in the structure plan. Implementers stay focused on the plan’s main goal. The vision statement, embodying ideas from consultation and engagement, is the paper’s most idealistic element. It is a visual and written description of what residents can expect to see once the allotted time period ends.

Transferring and Going about

Understanding transportation habits in urban and rural areas is crucial for optimal land use and transportation integration. Construction may deviate from the blueprint due to developer preferences, site limits, or engineering criteria. This can make it difficult to implement structural designs utilizing RMA blueprints. As a result, it is critical to define minimum standards to ensure that the infrastructure provided can accommodate the anticipated degree of expansion.

Background and Major Concerns

This section gives a concise overview of conclusions derived from collected and processed data. It also streamlines information, highlights essential details, and justifies decisions in the structural plan’s development. Appendices with additional information may be included for future reference. So, the structure plan offers a comprehensive account of primary challenges, limitations, and prospects, emphasizing factors influencing decisions and subsequent actions. As part of this method, you should assess the market’s potential and the viability of potential growth routes.


What are the Benefits of a Well-organized Plan?

Regions identified as potentially suitable for expansion are approved to begin developing their related Structure Plans. Determine the best site and management for this growth, as well as if the planned and existing services and infrastructure can accommodate the surge of additional residents.

For what Function is a Building Designed?

The ability of an organization’s personnel to effectively execute their roles, as well as the organization’s capability to achieve its goals and objectives, determines its success. An organizational structure aids management in the coordination and administration of operations by assigning people different roles and duties.

Define the Term “local Structure Plan”

Concerns for local structure plans include residential density, subdivision, and infrastructure coordination at the neighborhood scale or less. A district or local structural plan can benefit even a tiny piece of a municipality or a number of suburban communities.


Structure plans faced increased scrutiny during the 1980s and 1990s due to several factors, including the lengthy development and implementation process, the technical and obscure content they contained, and their self-imposed nature on policies previously established by local district councils. This became abundantly obvious after the mid-1980s, when the first regional planning conferences were held and the first regional planning recommendations were issued. I appreciate you reading the structure of planning guide. Visit the website to learn more and expand your knowledge with other helpful resources. For a more extensive education on scope of planning, keep reading.

Scroll to Top